tutaj review najnowszego samsunga 64gb SSD -
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/samsungs-64gb-ssd-better-faster-stronger/podsumowanie review dyskow SSD -
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/08/13/flash_based_hard_drives_cometh/page12.htmlnajlepsze sa jednak komentarze do pierwszego linka jw, np.
co jest beeee ...."I've been using a Sandisk 32 GB SSD on a Dell Latitude D630 running Vista for about 3 months now. This wasn't cheap, and even with an early adopter mindset, this is a big disappointment; it does indeed reads much faster (about 30 times), but writes at least 3 times slower than the same D630 running a SATA.
Quiet is great, more battery is fine, and I hardly ever reboot using Vista almost instant sleep feature, but installing software or writing large files is *painful*. Plan for a lot of memory: you do *not* want to see your system paging for virtual memory.
Now maybe Vista is to blame, but the whole system will hang now and then for 10 secs or more. Is it indexing something, writing whatever system logs on disk, who knows, but a a few other users have reported the same issue with this SSD on Dell forums. No driver update has been released either since the SSD option was out.
I for one will try to switch back to a SATA. This is not ready for prime time, even if Samsung claim better write speed on its 64 GB."
co nie jest do konca beeee ...."As far as life expectancy, thanks to wear leveling (which distributes out the writes so you no longer pound individual memory cells until they go bad), life expectancy on an SSD is measured in years even under a worst-case scenario of constant writing. I've seen estimates as low as 2 years with constant writes and as high as 15 years with ordinary use. I've seen conventional HDDs conk out after a year or two, so that sounds good to me. "